🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."